Autel MK808-TS Review: Is This ABS Scan Tool with Live Data Worth It?

When it comes to diagnosing car issues, having the right tools can make all the difference. For DIY enthusiasts and even professional mechanics, an Abs Scan Tool With Live Data capabilities is invaluable. The Autel MK808-TS scanner is one such tool that promises to read and clear ABS codes, along with a host of other functions. After putting it to the test on a 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee, here’s a detailed look at the pros and cons of this scanner, especially focusing on its effectiveness as an ABS scan tool with live data.

One of the standout features of the Autel MK808-TS is its reliable performance on older vehicles. Specifically, it worked seamlessly with a 1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee (WJ), and continued to function well on models up to 2004. This is a significant advantage as many modern scan tools struggle with OBD-I and early OBD-II systems. For Jeep WJ owners, the MK808-TS proves to be a versatile tool. It competently handles a range of tasks including reading and clearing ABS codes, which is crucial for diagnosing braking system issues. Beyond ABS, it also effectively programs SKIM keys and reads engine codes, providing comprehensive diagnostic coverage. The ability to access live data is particularly noteworthy. This feature allows users to monitor real-time parameters from various vehicle systems, offering deeper insights into problems beyond just reading static fault codes. For ABS diagnostics, live data can be essential for pinpointing sensor malfunctions or hydraulic issues by observing wheel speed sensor readings and ABS module responses in real-time.

However, despite its functional strengths, the Autel MK808-TS does come with some notable drawbacks. The first major issue is its limited internal storage. While it boasts 64GB of storage, this is surprisingly insufficient to accommodate the complete suite of available updates. This limitation is perplexing, especially considering that Autel themselves produces both the tool and the updates. Users are almost forced to utilize an SD card to install all updates, which feels like an oversight in the design and product specification. In today’s tech landscape, 64GB should be more than adequate, but its inadequacy here is a significant inconvenience.

Another area where the MK808-TS falls short is its speed. The device is noticeably slow in operation. Simple tasks like booting up the software and navigating to the diagnostics menu can take a considerable amount of time. The sluggishness extends to error handling as well. For instance, if the ignition key isn’t turned to the ‘on’ position, the tool takes an excessively long time to time out, with no option to manually cancel the process. This slow response can be frustrating, particularly when time is of the essence in a diagnostic scenario.

Lastly, the update policy of Autel is less customer-friendly compared to competitors like Launch and Xtool. Autel provides only one year of free updates with the MK808-TS, whereas many competitors offer two years. Considering the cost of renewing updates, which can be substantial, the one-year period feels stingy. This update policy might lead users to consider purchasing a new tool after the update period expires rather than renewing, which seems counterproductive for both the customer and the company in the long run. A more reasonable update renewal price could encourage users to stay within the Autel ecosystem and keep their tools updated.

In conclusion, the Autel MK808-TS is a capable ABS scan tool with live data that performs reliably, especially on older Jeep models. Its ability to read ABS codes, access live data, and perform other diagnostic functions makes it a useful tool. However, the limitations in internal storage, speed, and the less generous update policy detract from its overall value. While it functions well as an ABS scan tool with live data, potential buyers should weigh these drawbacks against its benefits, especially when considering long-term use and update costs. Overall, considering these factors, a rating of 2 out of 5 stars seems appropriate, primarily due to the storage and update policy issues.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *