VCDS with Knock Off: Genuine vs. Clone Cables

This article delves into the world of VCDS (Vag-Com Diagnostic System) cables, specifically comparing a genuine Ross-Tech cable with two different knock-off versions. We’ll examine their functionality, performance, and potential risks. This detailed analysis aims to inform those considering a budget-friendly alternative to the official VCDS system.

Decoding the Knock-Off VCDS Landscape

The quest for an affordable VCDS solution often leads to the exploration of knock-off cables. This investigation involved testing two distinct types: one based on the Atmega162 chip and another utilizing the STM32F405 chip.

The Atmega162 Cable: A Hex-CAN in Disguise

The first cable, marketed as a VCDS version 2 (V2), turned out to be a Hex-CAN cable, an older generation. Priced at $29, it required a separate loader executable flagged as malicious by VirusTotal.

Interestingly, the Atmega162 is the same chip used in genuine Ross-Tech Hex-CAN cables.

Due to its outdated functionality and the security risk associated with the loader, this cable is not recommended. Using it in a virtual machine might mitigate the malware risk, but its performance won’t match a genuine V2 cable.

The STM32F405 Cable: A Viable Alternative?

The second cable, priced at $49, utilizes the STM32F405 chip, similar to the genuine V2. Surprisingly, it functioned without a loader or modification to the VCDS software. Testing over a month revealed faster logging and data access compared to the genuine Hex-CAN.

Further investigation involved removing the STM32F405 chip and attempting to bypass its Read-Out Protection (RDP).

While successful, this revealed potential instability due to the internal RC oscillator. Future efforts will focus on using the more stable HSE clock for improved reliability. A video demonstrating the RDP bypass is available: https://youtu.be/4JFo23tYOq0

Conclusion: Proceed with Caution

While the STM32F405 cable offered surprisingly good performance, it’s crucial to acknowledge the inherent risks associated with knock-off electronics. Compatibility with future VCDS updates is uncertain, and using unmodified software version 20.4.1 is likely required. While a genuine Ross-Tech cable remains the recommended choice, the STM32F405 clone presents a functional, albeit potentially risky, alternative for budget-conscious users.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *